The Federal high court has rejected reports that the newly assigned judge in the case of the leader of Indigenous People Of Biafra has resigned . The Federal High Court described the report as "minimally misleading" on Tuesday in a statement signed by Chief Registrar. Sulaiman Hassan.
Publications spreading on social media were allegedly argued by Judge John Tseoho, Chief judge of the Federal High Court was the new judge in Kanu's case who withdrawal, citing the illegality of his arrest.
However, in the declaration, the Chief Registrar said that the claim was "completely unfounded, fictitious, grossly, harmful and should not be considered in whole."
“The attention of federal administration in the Supreme Court was elicited with great concern in the online report, as mentioned above.
"The court has clearly rebutted the false and misleading report, and the honorable judge has argued for Judge John T, has resigned from Namdi Kanu's case and issued a statement regarding the legality of his arrest
READ MORE...ECOWAS PLANS ON HOW TO FIGHT TERRORISM.
," the explanation says.
According to Hassan, the real position is that the judicial tsoho assigned to another person (the "new" judge is "new"} in his ability as the top judge Namdi Kanu.
Hassan said: “So the reports related to it are completely wrong.
“Therefore, the defense team must be prepared to receive instructions on how a new judge can be issued.
“The High Court Federation is strongly warning of intentional misinformation to mislead the public and undermine trust in the judicial system. “We ask the public to pay attention and rely solely on confirmed information from official court sources.
"The court remains immobilized to preserve the judiciary through the proper procedures of the law."
However, Nan has certainly gathered that a case between the federal government and Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was assigned to Judge Nyako's the (withdrawal) to Justice James Omotosho.